I also thought it was on how many is left once one clan is eliminated. that's how we've always scored it. Noone ever corrected us either that I know of.
More accurate the way it's always been scored, every player's position gets counted, even after there's 3 players left. (unless it was a 6-0 of course)

Ive suggested 6 points for 1st place, 5 points for 2nd place and so on ending on 1 point for 6th place, just so overall points/scores are accumulated by the TEAM, minimum points for the losing team 6 maximum for winning team 15.

Personally I don't think there is anything wrong with the scoring system. I think the confusion is with how it is worded.

The scoring system is based on how many players of the same team are left after the last player of the opposition has been "killed".

So 1 player left would be 4-2, 2 players left would be 5-1, 3 players left would be 6-0. Don't see why the sudden confusion as it's always been this way, just the wording of the rule may need changing so the confusion doesn't happen again.

here here

I like krazyash's idea though, something to consider next season maybe?

I don't like it personally, the scores available should be consistent across all game modes. Just stick to a system what works then people don't do a "Super League" and complain

Saying it would give killer too much weight?
I can understand that.
I'm just all for anything that's more accurate, and that method counts every player's position.

Could lose some of the weight with 5,4,3,2,1, and 0 instead. You'd have 15 points from killer, and 14 from each gametype (except straight which has 12). This is all figures without bonus points.

I realize i was mistaken at top of page, the method we have really only counts 1st-3rd.

Edited at 17:07 Wed 19/06/13 (BST)

Edited at 17:09 Wed 19/06/13 (BST)

yeah, i quite liked the Super League Killer.

3 Games of 2 vs 2, Play 2 games and 1 Point for winning team.

would be more points available but its more consistent as the other types has 14 points i believe and Killer has 6 so a big difference there.

I did too, but isn't this FBL? (it also didnt count every position,didnt even look who was in 2nd, think he may have agreed to change that )

Exactly, thanks for noticing

Edited at 17:22 Wed 19/06/13 (BST)

Mine was just an example, a template so to speak, I just think it would be more fair if every position were acknowledged with some point(s) apart from last. Coming last should have it's own consequence.

yup, either way we need a system what can stick, I don't mind if its current system, just don't want the confusion again.

similar to how Super League keeps changing, people was complaining so i think we need to think of a system and stick to it

Skimming over most of that...

... just got in from work again so I am tired and not getting into a debate about this...

...but again, I asked mattywellie for the scoring system and I used what was relayed to me as I did not know the format. Although I am sure how it is now is how it was before.

I can alter the wording on the website when I get a chance to make it more understandable but I am not changing the format especially to that of the Super League James.

thats fine Jem, i didn't expect it to be changed.

Can i ask what is the point in the 24hr cap from fixture release of subs/swaps if players are playing pre 24hrs and posting the sub post 24hrs ?

Can I ask why theres talk of bonus points in cup being added when on website it says there is no bonus system for the cup.. meaning all is kept as it is, 3-1, 4-0, 2-2 .. ?? surely the website is right.

No sorry the website is incorrect, the weebly team were updating their services when we did the website so there are a few mistakes, it must not have updated. There is a bonus point for every win, no bonus points for a draw.

Ah right okay, thanks for confirming, was just unsure on it based on what it has on website.

I don't see a problem, in Uprisings case their guy is a clan hopper so they subbed nerdzz in to give him some games.

Not sure on Professionals but i do know Matty and Jay like to play clan games as early as they can. Either way we look at it its another game played

I told jay I would be his sub,

Then asked if he wanted to play it there and then, it was a mutual agreement so I don't see an issue with it the cap is there for the idiots that like to try and tactical sub in this case it wasnt like that. And claim they put the wrong people in but this wasnt this was due to a player being off so long so common sense should prevail.

So as long as both sides are in agreement its ok, sounds good