Yes as they were removed from the league as they had 3 maybe 4 active players in the team.

Really did not have the time to chack and make sure all results against Inpossibles have been removed as i need to go out. If i have time tonight it will be done fully if any have been missed

Think me and beastie should be given a warning and then allowed to capt our clans as a one off let off, what does everyone else think please

I don't know what the defaults for the Fighting Eagles vs Ninja Warriors game are, so haven't added those.

But i think one Sinners fixture is missing. They've already played 6 games.

78-42 vs Mouseketeers
102-18 vs Underdogs
54-66 vs Snooker Squad
72-48 vs Fighting Eagles
66-54 vs Uprising
78-42 vs Ninja Warriors

+50 for the wins

That puts them on 500 points.

Edited at 15:49 Wed 12/12/12 (GMT)

The way I see it...

The league was made for fun, how is stopping reliable players who everyone know has had experience from captaining clans fun for anyone? Even more so why would you allow them to captain on a name they have had previously, if they were to retain the rights to that name back from admin.

If you are to allow them on one account, you should let them on another, especially if they have people in line who will happily pick up the pieces if they do prove to be unreliable.

I don't think most would have a problem with it. It's no different than getting one of you're old accounts back, but we all know one person who would kick up a big fuss about it!!

May as well scrap the rule in my opinion!!

Thanks guys, more opinions would be appreciated too, ask your mums and ask your dads lol

I do think foxy should be allowed to captain his clan, he's not tried to hide who he is and seems like he's here to stay, we all know what experience he's had.. don't let a good captain go to waste!!

First, I don't really care about the rule- we don't have it on snooker so I don't mind if it's there or not.

If we do use the rule, it has to be implemented in a fair manner for everyone. Just because one player has loads of friends here that can confirm it's him, doesn't mean the rules can be circumvented. If someone else (someone less-known) comes along and makes a similar claim, it would have to be allowed as well.

The rule is there so that people who have proven incapable of running clans don't keep making new ones. That's why an entire season (or whatever it is now) is needed. I also think that the preseason friendlies tend to weed out most of the incapable teams.

In this particular case, the fact that it's the third attempt at Chips and Gravy in recent memory doesn't really make a great case that he can run a clan. But again, I don't really care either way.

Only cause I got banned Seb but I've seen the error of my ways and I'm here to stay. Just give me a chance to prove myself!

But they say they don't take old accounts into account, but would allow to captain on an older account.


Whatupwiththat?

Yes....

Yes, because then everyone knows that this player has had the experience (same account).
Anyone can claim that any account used to be theirs! That's why if you have a rule, then you either make the "exceptions" for everyone or you stick to it.

Just let them be captains foxy and pool beast don't see point in a rule which might affect how many clans are going enter the league

Thanks mate lol

Mich is that you?

No probs... LOL

totally agree here mate,this is the worst rule that they ever come up with,wondering who brought this idea, been FCL champion with LL. and now I can't captain a team? Wooow

Funny how if it was some people I.e Craig that's this rule was harming most of you would be all for it. I like jimmy he is a mate but a rule is a rule.

Obviously